A good article by Tess Dawson

Here is a really good article by Tess Dawson on specificity, respect, and the Gods. It’s a good and thought-provoking read. 

“Full deity-names are sacred and important. When used in their entirety, full names denote a specific deity in a specific set of relationships. This is important information to keep at the forefront of our minds, so let’s start using these full names more often. Names often reference relationships including connections with a locale, associations with animals or plants, or activities, or roles, or offices, or particular groups of people, or many other relationships and complex layered relationships.

Note that I said deity-names when used in their entirety. The problem is that we often do not use divine names in their entirety, and thus we’re missing some of the context. There’s a deep-seated omission that many of us engage in, even though we usually don’t know we’re doing it. It is a bad habit, a behavioral holdover, from living in cultures that reduce the deities out of existence—to two gods, one god, or no god. When we don’t use full names which detail these contexts and relationships, we’re missing information and we run the risk of not knowing exactly who it is we’re working with—even though we know we’re not working with two, one, or no gods, we end up still accidentally reducing to a few what are really many more.”

I’m really, really glad to see this being discussed. 

Advertisements

Posted on March 2, 2016, in Polytheism, theology, Uncategorized and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink. Comments Off on A good article by Tess Dawson.

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: