Why Odin/Christ and Not Baldr/Christ?

Someone commented in a facebook discussion that a friend of mine was inaccurate for stating in his recent piece that Christ was associated with Odin historically, assuming that Baldr would make a more logical syncretism and so my friend must be wrong. He’s not wrong, however and the comparison of Odin to Christ was one of the tools used to further the spread of Christianity in Northern Europe. We had a brief discussion on it and I thought, this is really interesting.

When finals are over, I’ll come back and flesh this out with sources, but for now, the key one that we should be looking at is the Saxon translation of the Gospels, “The Heliand.” (which is a hilarious text, omg, it really is). If you want to find a more muscular Christianity go no further than Christ sitting with his warrior thegns in the mead hall. Yes, you read that rightly. You see, apparently Jesus as he was presented in the Mediterranean world wasn’t all that appealing in the far north. (Our ancestors should have stuck with that idea, folks. Seriously). In order to attract people, following the dictum of Gregory the Great to Augustine (not Augustine of Hippo, the other one, from Cantubury, I believe), missionaries adapted things, just a little, to better fit the climate and culture. In other words, they took some liberties.

One of those liberties was syncretizing Odin with Christ. I agree that on the surface one has to look at that and go ‘huh?’ I mean it’s not the most logical choice, except it was. On the surface the comparison hinges on Odin hanging on Yggdrasil and Christ hanging on the Cross. In reality though, I think it goes deeper. Odin was (and is) a God of kings. It was a common part of the Christian missionary program to first convert the monarch or ruler of a particular community and then have him demand and execute conversion of his people. I think the focus on Odin is directly related to His associations with rulers. If He was the patron of the king then of course that is Who you’d want to mis-appropriate when trying to ease your own god in. It was part and parcel of the Christian agenda.

Now it may be that Baldr didn’t have the cultus during the conversation of northern Europe that Odin had, but I think the connection that was drawn between Odin and Christ had far, far more to do with kings and rulers and the desire of Christians to destroy the indigenous polytheism as quickly as possible.

One interesting book, before I sign off to get back to work on my papers for finals, is “The Germanization of Early Christianity” by J. Russell and when you read the “Heliand,” be sure to picture everyone in gold lame with too much hair like some strange made for tv movie 1970s style. It makes it so much more interesting and really emphasizes how ridiculous the usurping faith was.


Be sure to check out my other sites:

Wyrd Curiosities at Etsy

My academia.edu page

My amazon author page.

Walking the Worlds Journal

My art blog at Krasskova Creations

My blog about all things strange, weird and medieval.

And if you like what you see, consider becoming a sponsor at Patreon.

About ganglerisgrove

Galina Krasskova has been a Heathen priest since 1995. She holds a Masters in Religious Studies (2009), a Masters in Medieval Studies (2019), has done extensive graduate work in Classics including teaching Latin, Roman History, and Greek and Roman Literature for the better part of a decade, and is currently pursuing a PhD in Theology. She is the managing editor of Walking the Worlds journal and has written over thirty books on Heathenry and Polytheism including "A Modern Guide to Heathenry" and "He is Frenzy: Collected Writings about Odin." In addition to her religious work, she is an accomplished artist who has shown all over the world and she currently runs a prayer card project available at wyrdcuriosities.etsy.com.

Posted on May 2, 2017, in Heathenry, Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. 4 Comments.

  1. thetinfoilhatsociety

    I happen to be reading that book right now – the J. Russell book. It’s quite fascinating really, enough so that I stay up longer than I should at night reading.


  2. The only sort of “wrong” syncretism is one that is not approved of by a particular Deity and is said to be specifically verboten by said Deity. Lots of syncretisms happen historically that seem odd or even “wrong” to modern folks, and yet they happened.

    The ones that people come up with these days based on archetypal ideas? Now, there might be grounds for suggesting those are “wrong,” especially if someone comes up with them mentally and schematically in a quasi-monistic Deity-mashing exercise that is so beloved of those who aspire to do “spiritual art”; but if a given Deity confirms it by divination, then by all means, go for it. (Interestingly, that’s the last thing people often do, or even think to do…our Deities can be asked about these things, and should be asked about them, because They can and will answer! [Though, of course, They don’t have to…but They can, in any case!])


  3. I suspect the association of Odin with the Einherjar was also syncretized with the “Elect” of Christ.


  4. In the article, I actually said that those who would treat Odin and Thor as Christ-figures out to redeem humanity were missing the point. Those who would put Balder in that role are missing it as well. The Gods of Northern Europe were not World-Redeemers in the way Christ was: they were Folk Gods worshipped by and primarily concerned with a particular group of people. That’s not to say that people not of Northern European heritage can’t worship the Nordic Gods. I’ve noted on several occasions that most African-Americans have at least some European ancestry, and wondered why so many folkish Heathens want to enforce a “one drop” rule when choosing members. But I have also noticed that even among the most loudly anti-racist and Universalist Heathen groups — and among Pagan groups who focus on European deities — the membership is overwhelmingly of European descent.


%d bloggers like this: